Hi all,
I'm working on an SFZ where both filter 1 and 2 are engaged. Both are using the flexible LFO generator. When I do something like lfo05_cutoff2_oncc1=1200, Sforzando gives an error. It works just fine if I use the first filter instead of the second, or if I omit the oncc part from cutoff2. That unfortunately is not what I want to do, and according to an sFZ spec file I have, this should be supported. Using Sforzando 1.933. Any ideas?
Thanks!
is something bugged with lfox_cutoff2_oncc?
Moderators: eric_telemaque, davidv
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:42 pm
Re: is something bugged with lfox_cutoff2_oncc?
Ahh!
Its indeed a parsing bug, thanks for spotting this.
Make take a while for a fix as we are working tirelessly on a new product.
Cheers
Its indeed a parsing bug, thanks for spotting this.
Make take a while for a fix as we are working tirelessly on a new product.
Cheers
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:42 pm
Re: is something bugged with lfox_cutoff2_oncc?
I also think egn_cutoff2_oncc is bugged too. I swear it worked once but now I can't get it to work.
I'd be interested to know what cool product you have in the works!
I'd be interested to know what cool product you have in the works!
Re: is something bugged with lfox_cutoff2_oncc?
musicalman wrote:I also think egn_cutoff2_oncc is bugged too. I swear it worked once but now I can't get it to work.
Same issue, also lfo/eg_resonance2_onccXX.
musicalman wrote:I'd be interested to know what cool product you have in the works!
Lots of chipsynths

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest